The launch day of new GeForce GTX 680 is approaching and NVIDIA has designed a new logo for all high end graphics cards (GeForce GTX …):
The new logo for GeForce GTX
The GeForce GTX 680 (Kepler GK104 GPU, 705MHz max) will have 1536 CUDA cores divided in 96 compute units (16 shader processors per CU), 2 or 4 GB of GDDR5 memory and will have dynamic clocks: GPU clock will be dynamically adjusted according to the GPU load, GPU temperature or power draw.
A GeForce GTX 670 TI? A fake? The new GeForce logo brings a touch of truth to ther board…
According to rumors, GTX 680 is 10% faster than 7970 in Battlefield 3, and is slower in 3DMark11…
Epic Games’ Mark Rein with a sample of Kepler-based graphics card:
Last year, The Unreal Engine 3 Samaritan demo ran on a 3-way SLI of GTX 580. Today, Epic is showing it on one Next-Generation NVIDIA Kepler GPU.
Related links:
- NVIDIA Kepler Takes Shape: GeForce GTX 680 to Offer Dynamic Clocking, 2 and 4GB GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 680 (GK104): 4.3 teraflops of computing power?
- GK104 Dynamic Clock Adjustment Detailed
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX LOGO
- NVIDIA GTX 680 (GK104)
- Epic Games Shows Off Unreal Engine 3 in Flash and Kepler
- The SemiAccurate guide to Nvidia Kepler/GK104/GTX680 launch activities
- TSMC suddenly halts 28nm production
Anyone notice how fake this is the top Says GTX haha and the side says TI.
Anyone that knows video cards obviously knows a TI is not a GTX.
it’s meant to be played, baby. I like NVidia’s dynamic comparsion shots http://international.download.nvidia.com/geforce-com/international/comparisons/Samaritan/GDC2012/Samaritan-MSAAFXAA-Comparison-1.html
I bet this card will be hot and loud in a desperate attempt to beat AMD.
The comparison simply looks like a blur has been applied whereas edge-detect super-sampling (whilst performance sapping) is much sharper and cleaner. Also, dragging FXAA line towards left show it is even worse for jaggies than MSAA.
“I bet this card will be hot and loud in a desperate attempt to beat AMD.”
Because the 580 was hot and loud to beat 6970
wake up to yourself >.>
SMiThaYe it doesn’t matter because jaggies are the most visible on contrast parts like edges of buildings. No one look at dark parts of games. I always check FSAA looking at edges of buildings against the sky or something like that, where it catches the eye
wft, 3rd picture, it says “570 ti” (not 670ti) , look closely and zoom. lol
SMAA is better
i believe that card is true. so the top card releasing soon would be gtx670ti?
Im a tad skeptical on the rumor that its 10% faster in BF3 and slower in 3dmark… why?
http://wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/220329m6tnt4axtfl8tnif.png
Results have yet to be proven of course but if they got 86fps in BF3 on a 7970 and 101fps on a gk104 thats 17% faster in BF3…and 70% faster in 3dmark