The new Raspberry Pi 3 board comes with a new processor and higher clock speeds. Let’s benchmark it against the Raspberry Pi 2 board.
1 – CPU Benchmark
To benchmark the CPU, I used Sysbench, a cross-platform and multi-threaded benchmark tool. The installation of Sysbench on Raspbian is rather easy:
$ sudo apt-get install sysbench
Now that Sysbench is installed, we can launch the multi-threaded (4 threads) CPU test with:
$ sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 --num-threads=4 run
– RPi 3: 120 seconds
– RPi 2: 193 seconds
The output of Sysbench for the Raspberry Pi 3 is:
sysbench 0.4.12: multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark Running the test with following options: Number of threads: 4 Doing CPU performance benchmark Threads started! Done. Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 20000 Test execution summary: total time: 120.0822s total number of events: 10000 total time taken by event execution: 480.2085 per-request statistics: min: 47.69ms avg: 48.02ms max: 83.48ms approx. 95 percentile: 48.42ms Threads fairness: events (avg/stddev): 2500.0000/15.30 execution time (avg/stddev): 120.0521/0.02
2 – GPU Benchmark
For the GPU benchmark, I used the OpenGL 2.1 test that comes with GeeXLab:
This test requires the latest Raspbian with OpenGL 2.1 support.
– RPi 3: 192 FPS
– RPi 2: 165 FPS
3 – Burn-in Test
The Raspberry Pi 3 comes with a new ARM Cortex A53 CPU clocked at 1200MHz. The GPU, the Videocore IV is overclocked compared to the RPi 2: 400MHz vs 250MHz. So it’s interesting to see the impact of higher clock speeds on CPU/GPU temperature when the Raspberry Pi is stressed by both Sysbench + GeeXLab.
To stress test the RPi, I launched the OpenGL 2.1 test of GeeXLab as well as Sysbench at the same time (with 100000 for the max prime number):
$ sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=100000 --num-threads=4 run
The temperature of Raspberry Pi is visualized with a FLIR 4 thermal camera:
Raspberry Pi 2 thermal imaging
The max temperature of the RPi 2 main processor after 5 minutes of stress test was 71.9°C:
Raspberry Pi 3 thermal imaging
The max temperature of the RPi 3 main processor after 3 minutes of stress test was 92.2°C:
Why only 3 minutes for the Raspberry Pi 3? Because right after it reached 93°C, the board has frozen.
Ok 93°C is very hot but it’s normal because of the higher clock speed. Let’s add a heatsink on the BCM2837 processor:
Ah… the temperature is better: only 70°C after 5 minutes of stress test.
4 – Conclusion
In the CPU benchmark, the RPi 3 is around 40% faster than the RPi 2. In the GPU benchmark, the RPi 3 is around 20% faster.
In sever situations when the CPU (or the GPU + CPU) runs at 100%, the RPi 3 requires a heatsink on the main processor to dissipate the heat produced by higher clock speeds. The RPi is getting bulky…
6 thoughts on “(Tested) Raspberry Pi 3 vs Raspberry Pi 2: CPU and GPU Benchmarks (+ Burn-in Test)”
2) Graph not starting from 0! The difference is minimal!
Leave the compatibility and update all the SoC.
Rpi3 is too hot, for same price I prefer Odroid C2
Saw the GeeXLab plot and thought: Wow! Nearly three times as fast! until I saw the X-axis…
Come on, making readable plots isn’t that hard! It is intended to give a visual impression of the difference but letting it start at an arbitrary place on the X-axis kill this.
Same with the thermal images, the Pi 3 image looks like the Pi 2 – but the scaling is different…
You can do better if you try!
Indeed previous graphs were marketing-like graphs 😉 I updated them!
I guess the OS in Pi 3 was only a 32-bit version, right?
yes, Raspbian Jessie is a 32-bit OS.
I am testing my raspberry pi 3 for its peak performance and maximum temperature,
as mentioned above, i am running both GeeXLab & Sysbench at the same time.
i am getting 166 fps at max, while the sysbench test taking about 3000 secs, the major thing is i am getting the case (surface) temperature to be 44°c (measured with thermo-couple) while the junction temperature read by command is maximum of 68°c.
when compared with the temperatures you are getting it is quite half of it. what is the mistake i might be doing? And did you adjust your IR camera for its emiseivity of processor ?
Pls do reply.
Comments are closed.