GeForce GTX 680: HD 6990 vs GTX 690, GTX 685 GK110 Possible Specs

10 thoughts on “GeForce GTX 680: HD 6990 vs GTX 690, GTX 685 GK110 Possible Specs”

1. VideoCardz 2012/03/21 at 17:38

   http://videocardz.com/31126/geforce-kepler-gk110-specification

   Source you’ve forgotten.
2. JeGX Post Author2012/03/21 at 17:42

   Thanks for your link, the source was not mentioned on beyond3d forum.
3. Voxilla 2012/03/21 at 19:12

   Sure, complete crap, fud, …
4. Psolord 2012/03/21 at 21:16

   Well, the GTX 680 specs are already wrong, but I guess that a typo. They probably meant 1536 cores.

   A GK100/110 with 12 SMXs as these specs suggest, would be a serious behemoth though.

   I am getting more and more interested in 670/680, but I think it would be wise to wait for the big daddy.
5. Jason 2012/03/22 at 01:30

   Correct me if I’m wrong but the article says: GeForce GTX 680: HD 6990 vs GTX 690, GTX 685 GK110 Possible Specs, There is a picture of a 6990 and the table say 7970. Intensional or honest mistake? hmmm???
6. Leith Bade 2012/03/22 at 02:38

   lol at the Gaming Performance %….

   Completely arbitrary… ie what game, what res (must be low res considering 680 > 7970)
7. Squall Leonhart 2012/03/22 at 08:52

   don’t be a noob, nvidia won’t be releasing GK110 as a 600 part. any idiot would realise that.
8. Squall Leonhart 2012/03/22 at 08:55

   also geeks3d, have some quality would you, stop using sites that only post garbage for hits as a source. videocardz has never been right period.
9. Squall Leonhart 2012/03/22 at 08:56

   i mean.. really, the chart doesn’t even get the TDP or launch price right.
10. Leith Bade 2012/03/22 at 10:38

    First early review:
    http://australia.tweaktown.com/reviews/4622/nvidia_geforce_gtx_680_kepler_2gb_reference_card_video_card_review/index1.html

    They got ignored by NVIDIA so they decided to post ahead of NDA!

Comments are closed.