[Tested] SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6870 1024MB Review

SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6870 Review Index

6 – SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6870 DirectCompute performances

For measuring DirectCompute performances, I simply used the Compute Shaders samples that come with DirectX 11 SDK June 2010.

NBodyGravityCS11 DirectCompute 11 demo

– NBodyGravityCS11 test, res: default size.

Avg FPS: 376 – ATI Radeon HD 5870
Avg FPS: 374 – ASUS ENGTX580
Avg FPS: 297 – EVGA GTX 480
Avg FPS: 277 – ASUS EAH6870
Avg FPS: 273 – Sapphire Radeon HD 6870
Avg FPS: 223 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC
Avg FPS: 198 – MSI R5770 Hawk

– HDRToneMappingCS11 test, res: 1920×1080 windowed.

Avg FPS: 1090 – ASUS ENGTX580
Avg FPS: 960 – EVGA GTX 480
Avg FPS: 913 – ATI Radeon HD 5870
Avg FPS: 834 – ASUS EAH6870
Avg FPS: 834 – Sapphire HD 6870
Avg FPS: 550 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC
Avg FPS: 493 – MSI R5770 Hawk

SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6870 Review Index

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Related posts:

  1. [Tested and Burned] SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6970 2048MB Review
  2. (Tested) ASUS EAH6870 1GB Review, Direct3D Performances (Part 4)
  3. (Tested) ASUS EAH6870 1GB Review, OpenCL and DirectCompute Performances (Part 5 and 6)
  4. [Tested] ASUS Radeon HD 6950 2GB GDDR5 Review
  5. [Test] ASUS EAH6870 1GB Review, OpenGL Performances (Part 3)

13 thoughts on “[Tested] SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6870 1024MB Review”

  2. JeGX Post Author

    GTX 580 Crysis score is for the next review. I’m testing a GTX 580 from EVGA…

  3. Lokavidu

    guys seriously consider putting the index on the bottom of the site too.. using home key is a bit annoying and unfamiliar

  5. iPristy

    OK, will you then compare 6870 vs 580 ?

    Radeons are fast enough in games, artificial bench demos it’s about the same as Sunspider bench who cares about that.

  6. JeGX Post Author

    @iPristy: sure, all previous scores (HD 5870, HD 6870, GTX 4xx) will be in EVGA GTX 580 review.

  7. Pingback: [Tested and Burned] EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com

  8. Pingback: [GPU Tool] ShaderToyMark 0.2.0 Demomakers’ Benchmark Available with Better SLI and CrossFire Support - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com

  9. Pingback: AMD Catalyst 10.12 WHQL (OpenGL 4.1, OpenCL 1.1) - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com

  10. Pingback: [Tested and Burned] SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6970 2048MB Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com

  11. Pingback: [Tested] ASUS Radeon HD 6950 2GB GDDR5 Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com

  12. Pingback: [Tested and Burned] ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com

  13. kromar

    these opengl tests do not at all reflect the performance of real opengl applications.
    when using the latest fermi architecutre in opengl heavy 3d apps like blender, maya and so on the true weakness of these cards emerge.

    it would be really great if you could add a test done in blender to the ones yu already did to see how the “real” opengl performance is.

Comments are closed.