Test summary:
- 1 – N460GTX Cyclone 765D5 OC overview
- 2 – N460GTX Cyclone 765D5 OC features
- 3 – N460GTX Cyclone 765D5 OC performances
- 4 – N460GTX Cyclone 765D5 OC power consumption and temperatures
- 5 – N460GTX Cyclone 765D5 OC overclocking
1 – N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC Edition overview
MSI’s N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC Edition is a factory-overclocked GeForce GTX 460. Only the GPU is overclocked and since GTX 460 are known to have nice overclocking capabilities, MSI’s product comes with a GPU clocked at 725MHz (+50MHz) which is far from the max clock as we’ll see it at the end of the test.
N460GTX Cylone is based on the GF104 GPU which support all latest technologies: OpenGL 4.x, DirectX 11 (I should write Direct3D 11…), OpenCL 1.x, PhysX and CUDA. This card is equiped with a quiet VGA cooler with a 9cm fan and two heatpipes. I use this card for all my development needs since several days and this is a really nice product. This card is really quiet even under load and this point is important for me because my devstation is in an IKEA-based open case ( 😀 yes IKEA has some cool test benches, don’t you know it?)!
2 – N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC features
3 – N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC performances
Testbed:
– CPU: Core i7 960 @ 3.2GHz
– RAM: 4GB DDR3 Corsair Dominator
– Motherboard: GIGABYTE X58-A UD5
– Windows 7 64-bit
– R258.96
– PSU: Corsair AX1200
3.1 FurMark (OpenGL 2)
FurMark 1.8.2 has been used for the test. FurMark homepage is HERE.
Settings: 1920×1080 fullscreen, no AA, 60sec, Xtreme mode UNCHECKED.
Rule: The higher the number of points, the faster the card is.
6470 points – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
5420 points – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7)![]() |
5161 points – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
3884 points – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
2772 points – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.7)![]() |
3.2 TessMark (OpenGL 4)
TessMark 0.2.2 has been used for the test. TessMark homepage is HERE.
Settings: 1920×1080 fullscreen, no AA, 60sec, map set 1.
Rule: The higher the number of points, the faster the card is.
Tessellation: moderate
48084 – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
38191 – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
30512 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
20745 – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.7)![]() |
Tessellation: normal
29196 – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
23316 – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
17452 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
7669 – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.7)![]() |
Tessellation: extreme
13008 – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
9997 – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
6729 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
2159 – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.7)![]() |
Tessellation: insane
3963 – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
3169 – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
1959 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
565 – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.7)![]() |
3.3 FluidMark (PhysX + OpenGL 2)
FluidMark 1.2.0 has been used for the test. FluidMark homepage is HERE.
Settings: 1920×1080 fullscreen, no AA, 60sec, 3 emitters, 120000 particles, Async mode ON.
Global: 287 points, PhysX: 249 (41SPS), GraphX: 504 (83FPS) – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
Global: 264 points, PhysX: 229 (37SPS), GraphX: 460 (76FPS) – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
Global: 207 points, PhysX: 180 (29 SPS), GraphX: 362 (60 FPS) – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
3.4 MSI Kombustor (Direct3D 9)
MSI Kombustor 1.1.3 has been used for the test. MSI Kombsutor is a Direct3D 9, 10, 11 and OpenGL 2 and 3 stress test and benchmark. I just tested the Direct3D 9 rendering.
Settings: 1920×1080 fullscreen, no AA, 60sec, Unlock power draw CHECKED.
1991 – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
1962 – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7)![]() |
1595 – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
1201 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
943 – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat 10.7)![]() |
3.4 Unigine Heaven (DirectX 11)
Ungine Heaven 2.1 has been used for the test.
Settings: 1920×1080 fullscreen, tessellation: normal, shaders: high.
47.6 FSP, Scores: 1200 – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R256.96)![]() |
32.8 FPS, Scores: 825 – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat 10.7)![]() |
32.4 FPS – Scores: 816 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
3.5 Lost Planet 2 (DirectX 11)
Lost Planet 2 has been used for the test.
Settings: 1920×1080 fullscreen, test A.
60.2 FPS – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (R258.96)![]() |
48.8 – MSI GeForce GTX 470 (R256.96)![]() |
38 FPS – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC (R258.96)![]() |
37.3 FPS – ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Cat10.7)![]() |
23 FPS – MSI R5770 Hawk (Cat10.7)![]() |
4 – N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC power consumption and temperatures
For measuring the power consumption, I use a simple wattmeter connected to the PSU input.
IDLE:
– Total power consumption: 100W
– Max GPU Temperatureax: 35°C
Stress Test: FurMark Xtreme + Displ.Map + 1920×1080 + No AA
– Total power consumption: 257W
– Max GPU Temperature max: 65°C
Stress Test: MSI Kombustor + D3D9 + Unlock power draw + 1920×1080 No AA
– Total power consumption: 231W
– Max GPU Temperature max: 64°C
Stress Test: MSI Kombustor + GL3 + Unlock power draw + 1920×1080 No AA
– Total power consumption: 254W
– Max GPU Temperature max: 63°C
The max power consumption is:
(257-100) * 0.9 = 141W where 0.9 is an avg PSU factor (no too far from the reality with the Corsair AX1200). And 65°C is a very nice GPU temperature under heavy load.
5 – N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC overclocking
Using EVGA Precision, I increased GPU clock and each time I ran a FurMark session (1920×1080 fullscreen + Xtreme mode + Displacement mapping).
The max stable (more than 15 min under FurMark) GPU clock I reached is 850MHz:
– Total power consumption: 264W
– Max GPU Temperature max: 65°C
The GTX 460 ref gpu clock is 675MHz, the N460GTX Cyclone OC is 725MHz and you can push this card up to 850MHz. No doubt, the GF104 GPU is a gem for graphics card overclockers!
More than 850MHz lead to system freezes.
you can push it to 900/1800/2300 with a little extra vGPU.. 1.09v (default is 1.00v)..
I am curious if this graphics card will run on a 450w PSU with an intel i5 quad (95 watt) and a Gigabyte intel P55 board. I don’t really plan to run much else on it besides one hard drive and two DVD-RW drives. If it fits within my power specs, it’s definitely a winner.
Could do a test with MSI N460GTX CYCLONE 1GD5/OC with 256-bit?
Pingback: [Tested] ASUS ENGTX580 1536MB at Geeks3D Labs - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com
Pingback: [Tested] SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6870 1024MB Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com
Pingback: [GPU Tool] ShaderToyMark 0.2.0 Demomakers’ Benchmark Available with Better SLI and CrossFire Support - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com
Pingback: [Tested and Burned] SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6970 2048MB Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com
Pingback: [Tested] ASUS Radeon HD 6950 2GB GDDR5 Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com
Pingback: [Tested and Burned] ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP Review - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com